Wed 18 Mar 2009
The War On Contracts
Posted by RichSlick under John Galt, The Fed, Watch Out
[5] Comments
Have you been paying attention to the mass movement to fight a war on contract law? By now, you’ve heard of those dreaded AIG bonuses and while I agree it’s total crap that bonuses were handed out from government funds, there is something to be said about contractual obligations and contract law.
Imagine if anyone could simply void a contract because they changed their minds or suddenly didn’t like a company. Over the past week I’ve read three key articles that speak to the movement to invalidate centuries of contract law.
First, a bankruptcy judge in California has ruled that a city can .
In the first ruling of its kind, a bankruptcy judge held the city of Vallejo, Calif. has the authority to void its existing union contracts in its effort to reorganize, holding public workers do not enjoy the same protections Congress gave union workers at private companies.
Secondly, there is pending legislation in Congress to give bankruptcy judges the ability to with regards to foreclosures.
Washington — Legislation that could provide a last-ditch option for Nevada homeowners facing foreclosure has passed the House but is facing a tougher time in the Senate.
The bill, an element of President Barack Obama’s housing recovery plan, would give bankruptcy courts the authority to reduce mortgages as part of an intense court-monitored plan to restructure homeowner debt. Even families who don’t declare bankruptcy could benefit because the law would add pressure on lenders to rewrite loans before homeowners turn to bankruptcy court.
Third, there is great talk of invalidating AIG employees contracts with regards to their bonuses. Don’t get me wrong, I am AGAINST these payouts BUT if the company had a contractual obligation to pay then it had a contractual obligation to pay.
One of the cornerstones of capitalism is contract law. Person A and Person B wanting to conduct business or agree to something do so under a contract and if there is an issue with performance under the contract then a judge & jury can be called upon to settle the differences. Unfortunately, now we’re headed into a situation where a single judge somewhere may arbitrarily change the terms of a contract and essentially force one of the parties to perform unreasonably under the contract. Worse yet is the power of the state to simply void contracts for the “benefit” of the people.
In my view, the four legs of capitalism are: capital (money), people, contract law, industry. It seems the four legs are under assault and weakening day by day. Capital is disappearing, people are being laid off, contract law is under attack and industry is on the verge of bankruptcy. Only time will tell where the assault will lead everyone to at the end of the day. Where is John Galt?
March 20th, 2009 at 6:18 am
It is strictly written in the Constitution that the federal government cannot break contracts between two parties. Congress couldn’t stop the AIG bonuses, but now they are trying to tax them at 90%. This is a retroactive tax (forbidden by the Constitution) and potentially a punitive tax (arguably also illegal).
Geithner authorized the bonuses because he knows there was nothing he could really do to stop them. As bad as he is at his job, he got this one right.
March 21st, 2009 at 7:47 am
I also love how these same congressmen were also looking to void all the contracts of the GM employees 2 months ago. I agree with slick, it may suck that they have to pay them, but a contract is a contract. If you are going to opt out of the contract, usually there is some form of monetary compensation as well.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:04 pm
Slick,
Just wondering what you thought of this article I found at another PF website:
thanks
March 29th, 2009 at 5:17 pm
massive inflation is coming, it’s just a question of when it will hit.
March 30th, 2009 at 7:41 am
Malaysian bankruptcy laws allow for changes in contracts entered into 6 months before bankruptcy…at least I think so.
Anyway, I thought banks were famous for inserting clauses like…..this and that can be changed at any time for any reason whatsoever…. It would seem so if you look at loan agreements from almost any bank anywhere.
Maybe AIG’s legal people were also due the bonuses.