<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Too Expensive to Hire Women?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.getrichslick.com/too-expensive-to-hire-women/249/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.getrichslick.com/too-expensive-to-hire-women/249/</link>
	<description>Getting Rich Slick® has never been so easy...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 05:13:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RichSlick</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslick.com/too-expensive-to-hire-women/249/comment-page-1/#comment-2221</link>
		<dc:creator>RichSlick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslick.com/2007/04/25/too-expensive-to-hire-women/#comment-2221</guid>
		<description>I guess the question then becomes, why isn&#039;t ALL insurance based on &quot;equal&quot; payer system?

Why do some people pay more for life insurance than others?  Why do some drivers pay more than others?  It seems we have rational thinking plans for insurance but when it comes to health insurance we impose all sorts of crazy rules.

If a drunk driver frequently crashes his vehicle it makes sense that he should pay more for insurance.

If a person who is a drug addict and has a history of disease (hepatitis, aids, etc) it makes sense that he/she should pay more for life insurance than someone else.

If a woman ends up going to the doctor more frequently (for whatever reason) or has higher cost treatments (for whatever reason) why shouldn&#039;t they pay more for insurance?

People will quickly cry &quot;discrimination&quot; but never bother looking into the real reason why disparities exist in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the question then becomes, why isn&#8217;t ALL insurance based on &#8220;equal&#8221; payer system?</p>
<p>Why do some people pay more for life insurance than others?  Why do some drivers pay more than others?  It seems we have rational thinking plans for insurance but when it comes to health insurance we impose all sorts of crazy rules.</p>
<p>If a drunk driver frequently crashes his vehicle it makes sense that he should pay more for insurance.</p>
<p>If a person who is a drug addict and has a history of disease (hepatitis, aids, etc) it makes sense that he/she should pay more for life insurance than someone else.</p>
<p>If a woman ends up going to the doctor more frequently (for whatever reason) or has higher cost treatments (for whatever reason) why shouldn&#8217;t they pay more for insurance?</p>
<p>People will quickly cry &#8220;discrimination&#8221; but never bother looking into the real reason why disparities exist in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mapgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslick.com/too-expensive-to-hire-women/249/comment-page-1/#comment-2083</link>
		<dc:creator>mapgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslick.com/2007/04/25/too-expensive-to-hire-women/#comment-2083</guid>
		<description>Being fat is not a protected class. Being female is.

Perhaps the issue is who is paying for the insurance, i.e. not having a single payer system. Do that and you&#039;ve just eliminiated the cost disparity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being fat is not a protected class. Being female is.</p>
<p>Perhaps the issue is who is paying for the insurance, i.e. not having a single payer system. Do that and you&#8217;ve just eliminiated the cost disparity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dong</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslick.com/too-expensive-to-hire-women/249/comment-page-1/#comment-2071</link>
		<dc:creator>dong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslick.com/2007/04/25/too-expensive-to-hire-women/#comment-2071</guid>
		<description>Interesting, I never knew.  On the tobbaco and obesity bit there was businessweek cover story talking about companies trying to control their health care costs by basically incentivizing people to lose weight and or quit smoking.  I think that&#039;s smart.  Gender, not sure how or if you should control for that cut costs...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, I never knew.  On the tobbaco and obesity bit there was businessweek cover story talking about companies trying to control their health care costs by basically incentivizing people to lose weight and or quit smoking.  I think that&#8217;s smart.  Gender, not sure how or if you should control for that cut costs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RichSlick</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslick.com/too-expensive-to-hire-women/249/comment-page-1/#comment-2067</link>
		<dc:creator>RichSlick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslick.com/2007/04/25/too-expensive-to-hire-women/#comment-2067</guid>
		<description>c, I always thought there was some law mandating insurance cost the same for everyone because when I ask around the only difference in what people pay seems to be for those that are single or those who are married.

it turns out the employer has been picking up the tab on the back side probably to avoid the  blatant disparity with the employees.  

I could only imagine the fiasco if a female employee found out she was paying $150 more than her male counterpart for the same health insurance plan.

Perhaps this helps explain why women supposedly earn $0.76 for every $1.00 a man earns; the employer is subsidizing the health insurance and there&#039;s no such thing as a free ride!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>c, I always thought there was some law mandating insurance cost the same for everyone because when I ask around the only difference in what people pay seems to be for those that are single or those who are married.</p>
<p>it turns out the employer has been picking up the tab on the back side probably to avoid the  blatant disparity with the employees.  </p>
<p>I could only imagine the fiasco if a female employee found out she was paying $150 more than her male counterpart for the same health insurance plan.</p>
<p>Perhaps this helps explain why women supposedly earn $0.76 for every $1.00 a man earns; the employer is subsidizing the health insurance and there&#8217;s no such thing as a free ride!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslick.com/too-expensive-to-hire-women/249/comment-page-1/#comment-2060</link>
		<dc:creator>c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslick.com/2007/04/25/too-expensive-to-hire-women/#comment-2060</guid>
		<description>Rich,your the first I&#039;ve seen to talk about this taboo subject.I wasn&#039;t even aware of the insurance price gap.
The case could also be easily made that obesity and smoking are also very expensive for companies to deal with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich,your the first I&#8217;ve seen to talk about this taboo subject.I wasn&#8217;t even aware of the insurance price gap.<br />
The case could also be easily made that obesity and smoking are also very expensive for companies to deal with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

