Mon 8 Jan 2007
Writing an ETF Covered Call
Posted by RichSlick under MMO
[10] Comments
I’m going to go through some of the mechanics here of writing a covered call on an ETF for a reader with some questions.
First thing you need to do is own or purchase an ETF that trades options. I’m using SMH (Semiconductors) ETF as an example.
When trading options remember that 100 shares = 1 contract. If you want to sell contracts you need to have at least 100 shares and round lots of 100 only. There are no “half-contracts” you can sell with 50 shares or other weird denominations. There are special circumstances when a stock splits or gets merged with another company but those are usually listed as “special” or “NS – Non Standard” and your best bet is to avoid trading any of those. Options EXPIRE EVERY THIRD FRIDAY OF THE MONTH. Most ETFs don’t trade options EVERY SINGLE MONTH so plan your trades accordingly.
Click on the image to follow along.
I bought 1000 shares of SMH; this means I can sell 10 Call Options on my stock. This will give someone else the right to buy my stock at a pre-determined price. What price can they buy my stock from me at? That depends on what Call Strike Price I selected when I sold the Calls.
If you look at the image, you can see the STRIKE column on the far left of the table. Listed below are amounts such as 20, 25, 30, 35, 37.50. Each of those STRIKE prices has a SYMBOL associated with it such as
- SMHAD = 20
- SMHAE = 25
- SMHAG = 35
I bought SMH for $34.25/share. If I bought in at $34.25 it doesn’t make sense to sell Calls for anything less than what I bought the stock or I’ll lose money. That means the only strike prices I could sell were for $35, $37.50, or $40. You’ll see that as you go up in strike price, the less money people are willing to pay.
If I had sold my Calls OUT-OF-MONEY at $37.50 (SMHAU) I would only receive $0.05 for each contract so I would have received $0.05 x 10 (contracts) x 100 (shares) = $50.00. This amount of money wouldn’t be worth the trouble.
If I sold calls IN-THE-MONEY at $35 (SMHAG), I would receive $0.25 for each contract so I would have received $0.25 x 10 x 100 = $250. Much better!
Back in early December, option traders were willing to pay me $0.85 per contract so I made 10 (contracts) x 100 (shares) x $0.85 = $850.00. Today, they’re only willing to pay $0.25 so I could buy back my own contracts at $0.25 and keep the difference! Sold $0.85 and buy back at $0.25 = $0.60 profit per contract ($600). Should I buy them back or should I hold out for $35?
If I wait and SMH hits $35, I’ll make and additional $0.75/share because I bought in at $34.25 and will be forced to sell at $35.00. That translates into another $750 in profit! Wait or Cover?
Now, what happens if you bought at $34.25, Sold $35 contracts but the ETF went down to $30.00?
In this scenario, your contracts will likely end up being worth $0.05 or less because who would want to buy the right to buy your stock from you at $35 when they can just go and buy it outright on the open market for $30?
What do you do if SMH is now stuck at $30 and want to sell more calls?
You have some options (pun intended). The further you go out into the future on a calendar, the higher the premium paid for the calls. If you click this link
You will see that January 2009 $35 call strike options are selling for $5.50. Wow that sounds pretty cool $5.50 x 10 x 100 = $5500 I could pocket right now!
But the problem is Time Value of Money. If you pocket the $5500 now you’re earning 16% return on your investment. Sounds great EXCEPT you have committed your money & stock for the next TWO years until January 2009 and if two years from now the ETF is trading at $75 you are probably going to be kicking yourself because you’ve committed to selling your stock at $35.00 in exchange for receiving $5500 today. Those January 2009 options could be selling for $30/each if SMH shoots up to $75.00 in January 2009. If you’re happy with 8% return annually then by all means sell the January 2009 $35 strike price but remember that a lot can happen in two years!
So what you need to do is figure out what ROI is most desirable to you. If SMH dropped to $30 I wouldn’t want to risk losing my shares by selling $32.50 Calls because I paid $34.25 for them! If I owned SMH for 12 months and each month I’ve made $1000 in profit then I may be willing to do so if I’m interested in liquidating my position or have made enough profit on this ETF where losing a few hundred dollars wouldn’t really hurt my portfolio if I got called.
Mutual Fund fans always talk about Dollar Cost Averaging your shares. Well by selling covered calls, you’re effectively dollar cost averaging your shares except you get to see (and use) the cash in your account. I bought SMH at $34.25 and sold contracts for $0.85, my new break even point on SMH is $33.40 sans commissions.
So what you need to do is look for the HIGHEST YIELD with the SHORTEST TIME PERIOD so that you can repeat the process over and over again. I look for returns of 3% to 6% within a 30 to 60 day window on ETFs. I publish my findings every Friday over at .
I’ll follow up in two weeks on January 19th when Options Expire to further illustrate what happens. SMH may be above $35 to say $36.30 in which case I’ll be forced to sell at $35.00 and lose my stock or SMH may be below $35 to say $33 in which case I’ll keep my shares and look at February, May or August $35 strikes for some more call writing.
10 Responses to “ Writing an ETF Covered Call ”
Comments:
Leave a Reply
Trackbacks & Pingbacks:
-
Pingback from Writing an ETF Covered Call - Epilogue » Get Rich Slick
January 19th, 2007 at 1:30 pm[...] If you missed my first post, you’ll want to read it here. Today is Options Expiry and it looks like SMH will close below the $35 strike price which means I get to keep the $850 (2.5%) premium AND I get to hold on to my shares so that I can write February 07 or May 07 Calls. [...]
January 9th, 2007 at 6:35 am
Rich,why are there sometimes two ticker symbols
for the same strike price?
January 9th, 2007 at 8:43 am
There can be numerous reasons C. If you can provide a specific example I can tell you about that particular one but here are some reasons why:
1. The stock has split or reverse split and there needs to be a way to handle the change.
Example: Microsoft buys Apple. You own 1000 shares of apple but now you’ll own 800 shares of Microsoft. What if you had sold 10 apple contracts for January 2009 and the merger went through today? You’d end up with “Non Standard” Options contract in some situations
2. If you’re looking up options in finance.yahoo.com such as
You’ll see XLE followed by the letters AY, AD, AE, AF, etc. but you’ll also see OWJ followed by similar letters.
Why two? One set of options are the “normal” options associated with the ETF XLE, the other set are “special” options that trade QUARTERLY. In the case of XLE, you may notice that if you click FEBRUARY there are no OWJ options but if you click MARCH you’ll see the GQQ (Quarterly) options available.
You’ll find those (Quarterly) options for the months of MARCH, JUNE, SEPT, & DEC.
I don’t know of any way to do Covered Calls on Quarterly options. These options exists for option traders & probably hedge funds. You can trade these but you’re essentially buying and selling call options and not really doing covered calls. Note: 80% of options expire worthless which is why I don’t trade options.
Here is a table to know so you can better understand how the options symbols work.
January 9th, 2007 at 10:09 am
Rich,using the example you provided for SMH.I see there are two listings for the strike price of $20.One goes for $14.30,the other for $13.90.I just don’t understand why there is two different quotes for the same strike price of $20.The $25,$30,$35,$40 have two quotes also.
January 9th, 2007 at 11:29 am
I guess I left out LEAPS. There is another type of Option class called LEAPS that trade year(s) in advance every January. There is January 07, 08, and 09 and that is what these symbols represent in the case of SxHAG (LEAP) vs SMHAG (Normal).
If you had purchased SMH 3 years ago in 2004 (around $40/share) and wanted to sell LEAPS you would have sold SxHAG for January 2007 $35 strike price. Of course you really wouldn’t have wanted to do this three years ago since it you bought in at $40 and selling $35 calls doesn’t make much sense but it’s possible.
Lastly, there are a few more quirky things that can happen (running out of symbols for stocks that move up tremendously – i.e. google) and a few other things I won’t cover here (different exchanges, etc).
Depending on which broker you use, most of the time you will see only two types of option chains when you get quotes.
You will see STANDARD options and NON-STANDARD options. 99.99% of the time you will stick with STANDARD OPTIONS unless the stock you own undergoes a merger, split or buy out. Since I primarily trade ETFs this isn’t going to happen so it’s no big worry trading the wrong ETF symbol. You’ll eventually learn the symbols over time.
It looks daunting and confusing at first but you’ll be able to discard about 90% of the info you see on web pages and focus on what is important – ROI!
I’ve made it a simple as possible over at . Just click on the link to the report and you’ll see most of the “garbage” cleaned out.
January 11th, 2007 at 10:22 am
Rich,
I haven’t seen you mention the greeks when discussing options yet (delta, gamma, etc). Are you paying attention to those types of risks as well? Just curious.
January 11th, 2007 at 10:24 am
Sorry, shouldn’t push publish so quickly:
The reason I’m asking is because you said you were looking for the highest yield with the shortest time period…but there should be a reason that those ETFs have such a juicy yield even if the options expire in 30 days…right? Is the market trying to tell you (me) something with that?
Once again, just curious. I have exactly zero experience with options and most of my knowledge is purely academic.
January 11th, 2007 at 1:59 pm
Frankly frankyj there are millions of bits and pieces of information to every stock or ETF that it becomes rather pointless to try to create a THEORY OF EVERYTHING with equity instruments.
There is technical analysis (MACD, RSI, MFI, etc) then there are the chart wizards (Doji, candlesticks, long bodies, short bodies, head & shoulders, cup & handle, etc)
Then there’s the greek soup beta, gamma, blah, blah, blah.
It’s really simple for me. I run a report which shows me the highest yield with the shortest period on an ETF. I target 4% to 6% every 30 to 60 days.
I buy the ETF and two things are going to happen:
1. ETF price will go up and I get called in which case I’ll hit my target (4%) in 30 to 45 days (annualized it’s 20% to 40%).
2. ETF price will go down and I won’t get called. I’ll still make 2% or 3% and will hold the ETF until the next upswing where I can sell more calls or sell my position.
If you re-read the post, you might note that SMH is now at $35 as I write this and the calls have gone back up. I could have bought them back at $0.15 and SOLD THEM AGAIN for $0.50 but then that’s getting too greedy and I had no way of knowing they would go back up so quickly. SMH was at $33 a few days ago!
Either way, for me it’s a win-win. I win if I get called because I can move on to the next opportunity or I can re-buy and re-sell calls if it’s a good opportunity and I’ve pocketed the premium.
On the downside, i win because I still capture premium and can hold long term.
I guess the real question that you need to ask yourself is do you expect any ETF do go to ZERO. Do mutual funds ever go to ZERO? This would be the worse case scenario and if it does happen then there is probably something very wrong with the world for that to happen.
Now compare all of this to a mutual fund which just sits there waiting for hope and a prayer to take it higher.
I also have specific rules for ETF picking which I posted earlier and you should read. It’s not just the highest return and bingo make a trade. There is research that goes into it.
I bought SMH because I knew Microsoft was releasing Vista & Office 2007 and Apple has been selling like hot cakes and I knew they’d have something like a phone or tv product. The tech industry is hot and jobs are plentiful AND SMH was close to its 52 week low. All these things come together to give me a green light for this investment.
The cherry on this cake was the high yield in such a short time period: 4.6% in 42 days.
January 12th, 2007 at 8:13 am
Thanks for the insight Rich. Interesting, I will have to check out your other posts on this topic.
January 12th, 2007 at 9:05 am
You can read about the ETF Picking strategy here: http://www.getrichslick.com/2006/11/03/my-etf-picking-methodology/
You can also read about how you would trade a covered call inside your brokerage account here:
And lastly, I highly recommend you buy Ron Groenke’s Book CASH FOR LIFE which you can order from here:
The book explains most of what I’m doing much better and in a simpler form than I do on this blog and it’s quite entertaining.